Hands Off Democracy
Bruce Barbour - October 2020
The USA Experience
Corporations must not be allowed to have anything to do
with the workings of democracy. The consequences of
corporations interacting with political parties can be
easily seen in the USA where corporate America undoubted
control the Republican Party and have huge influence in
the Democratic party which effectively amounts to control.
Even if elected the Democrats won't do anything to upset
their main political funders - corporate America. The
people that lead the Democrats from the back rooms will do
all they can to ensure that their party is not taken back
by someone like Bernie Sanders or AOC, who would introduce
meaningful change, change that may impact the party's
corporate backers. Instead you get Biden and Clinton and,
I hate to say it, Obama. All bought and paid for by
corporate America.
When combined with the American voting system the result
is that there is no leftist party of consequence in the
USA for the people to vote for - just a party of the right
and another party a little bit more left but nowhere near
a left alternative. Due to their reliance on contributions
from the corporate America to maintain the parties both
have been bought and controlled by the corporations. The
consequence of this is that there are a lot of voters in
America which have no representation of their views in the
political sphere - they can see the Democratic party does
not represent their views so therefore they have no one to
vote for and so can see no point in voting.
Equally there are a whole lot of other voters who have
been hit dreadfully by the societal and work restructuring
by the political system controlled by the corporate
America. The aim of this restructure was to boost the
profits of corporations without any concern about the
social consequences. For many voters the American dream is
more of a nightmare. Their position in society has been
marginalised, their future is one of working in insecure
jobs on low wages with no status and little prospects of
improvement. They can see that this has been caused by the
political elite - from both parties - so they are angry.
They want to tear down the structures that have put them
in this position. When they get a politician of no
principle coming along and telling them he will tear down
the structures that put them in this position and to
"drain the swamp" they become supporters. It doesn't
matter that it is mostly lies - though in the case of
Trump he is tearing down some structures of Government and
replacing them with his cronies - one lot of swamp
dwellers is being replaced by even worst swamp dwellers.
The disillusioned believe the lies because it offers hope
- false hope - in their hopeless world. They are angry and
they just want to punish the people that have gotten them
into this position, and are gullible enough not to see
that Trump is part of the same system that has
marginalised them. He is not for them, he is for himself,
mainly, and for his rich elite friends. He was, and is, a
false saviour. Bernie Sanders would have been a better
saviour but there was no way the controllers of the
Democrats were going to allow that.
Youtube Link:
Why do 38% of Americans support Donald Trump?
Web page Link:
ABC
- Stan Grant - Neither Trump nor Biden have answers to
a broken America in this election
I understand their feelings, in someways I sympathize
with their feelings. If it was another time I might be
tempted to say - yes blow the place up - the USA needs to
be reset, to properly embed democratic principles in their
structures, to get rid of the control of the elites and
corporations. There are two issues with this. Firstly
Trump is not there to fundamentally change and fix America
- despite what he says - it is all fake news. He is not
about making fundamental change or change that would
benefit his working class supporters. Secondly the issue
is climate change. Action is needed immediately - not in
four years or eight years but now. Trump would do nothing
if re-elected - except increase greenhouse gas production.
However Biden is espousing substantive action - so long as
he follows through if elected and is not just telling the
people what they want to hear to get elected - and then
continue business as usual. That is very possible and that
would be disastrous.
This raises a question to me. Why aren't more candidates
raising these issues of the embedded problems in the USA
political system? And proposals to fix them. Though I did
hear Sanders recently saying that if the Democrats win by
a large margin, possibly gaining control of all three
parts of Government, the Presidency, Congress and Senate,
they should use the rare opportunity presented to bring in
substantive changes to embed social justice and democratic
principles back into the system. If the Democrats don't
implement change when they have the opportunity that would
confirm their corporate control.
Youtube Link:
The Unraveling of America: Is This the
End of the American Empire?
It is interesting that the Democracy
Index - 2019 - lists the USA as a "Flawed Democracy",
ranked just 25 out of 169 countries - pretty poor for the
self described "Greatest Democracy on Earth". (Australia
is ranked 9.) For the sake of their democracy, for the
sake of America, give back the power to the people. Let
the people dictate the operations of society - not the
corporate elites.
The point of this diatribe is that I want Australia - and
in fact the rest of the democratic world - to heed the
warning that is America. Protect your democracy regardless
of what you perceive as the costs of that protection. The
costs of not protecting it is very much higher. Don't go
down the same path as the USA.
Is Australia at Risk?
Is Australia vulnerable? While there are aspects of the
Australian voting system (the AEC, compulsory
voting, and preferential
voting to name a few) that to some extent mitigate
the risk and the parties still have many people in them
that believe in the overriding principles of democracy,
there is risk going into the future to Australia. To
mitigate this risk it is imperative that the corporations
be kept well away from our precious jewel that is
democracy.
Corporations should not be able to donate to or
have anything to do with political parties. Corporations
should not be able to donate to any sort of right wing (or
left wing for that matter) think tanks that may interfere
in the political process. The people that own the
corporations should only be allowed to donate to parties
at the level allowed of any other private citizen. Party
fund raisers would have to be highly regulated so they
don't become a backdoor means of making large donations.
If they break the regulations it would be punishable by
steep fines to the corporation or the individual and the
political party. The corporations would not be able to
donate to parties directly nor to third parties that would
run political advertising in support of a party. High
wealth (and low wealth) individuals would have similar
restrictions.
Instead a tax surcharge would be imposed on corporations
and organisations and the public (like a medicare levy) to
support the political process. It shouldn't be anymore
expensive to business - probably cheaper for many
corporations as it would be instead of their usual
political donations. For elections political parties would
be paid by the tax payer on the basis of an amount for
each vote they garner. If they are successful they would
be paid a small monthly amount while in Parliament, in
addition to their wages, to support their political
organisation, in addition to what they can garner from
individual memberships. The parties would have a lot less
money to run elections. But that will be alright. Media
outlets would be "encouraged" to donate time - say 3 - 5
minute TV windows and internet links - to all political
parties to enable them to explain their policies. No
thirty second attack ads - they would have to explain
their policies and the reasons they claim they are
superior to their opponents.
I have heard the argument that "you can't have the
taxpayer pay for the political parties. It is too
expensive." If we, the taxpayer, don't pay for it the
parties are most likely forced into the arms to the people
and organisations that have the money. And the
corporations have the most money and they can see the
benefit of controlling the political parties and process
to their bottom lines - otherwise they wouldn't give.
Given the risks highlighted in the previous paragraph it
is a heck of a lot more expensive if we allow the
corporation and the rich elites to control the political
parties - just look at America.
Contents Page.

|